Main | June 2006 »

May 31, 2006

Could Immigration Reform End the Housing Boom?

With much of residential building being done by illegal immigrants (40% by one estimate, 80% in Texas), any crackdown on their employment will strain an already short-handed building labor market.  This will subsequently increase the amount of time necessary to build a home by several months, which will substantially increase costs to the buyer.  Sounds like a pretty feasible scenario to us, considering the increasing frequency with which business are getting raided for hiring illegal workers.   

 

Frank Fuentes, president of the Hispanic Contractors Association, queried his 20 largest member firms about speaking with FORTUNE, and not one was willing.

 

"They're scared to death of being raided," says Fuentes.

By FORTUNE's estimate, up to 40 percent of new-home construction in the U.S. is being done wholly or partly by undocumented immigrants. Fuentes suspects the percentage in his home state of Texas is closer to 80 percent.

According to a study by the Pew Hispanic Center, 36 percent of insulation workers, 29 percent of roofers, and 28 percent of drywall installers are "unauthorized workers."

By Jon Birger and Jenny Mero, FORTUNE

 

"They're scared to death of being raided," says Fuentes.

By FORTUNE's estimate, up to 40 percent of new-home construction in the U.S. is being done wholly or partly by undocumented immigrants. Fuentes suspects the percentage in his home state of Texas is closer to 80 percent.

According to a study by the Pew Hispanic Center, 36 percent of insulation workers, 29 percent of roofers, and 28 percent of drywall installers are "unauthorized workers."

Big builders don't employ construction workers, legal or illegal. They hire subcontractors that in turn hire the workers who do the actual sawing and hammering.

"The entire home building business is outsourced," says A.G. Edwards analyst Greg Gieber. It's unclear whether this setup will protect builders should the feds start enforcing immigration laws more vigorously.

Big builders don't employ construction workers, legal or illegal. They hire subcontractors that in turn hire the workers who do the actual sawing and hammering.

"The entire home building business is outsourced," says A.G. Edwards analyst Greg Gieber. It's unclear whether this setup will protect builders should the feds start enforcing immigration laws more vigorously.

In May, Fischer Homes, a leading builder in Kentucky and Indiana, was raided by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and four Fischer supervisors were charged with harboring illegal aliens.

Court papers filed by ICE accuse Fischer of using subcontractors "to provide a layer" between it and some 75 illegal workers. That layer, the feds contend, "does not relieve Fischer of the responsibility to ensure that their contractors are employing a legal work force."

A crackdown on undocumented workers would shrivel an already tight construction labor market. Lee Wetherington of Lee Wetherington Homes in Sarasota, Fla., estimates that 70 percent of the workers employed by his subcontractors are Hispanic immigrants.

"If for any reason we lose that work force, you're going to see the time required to build a house double or triple and the cost of new homes increase 30 to 40 percent," Wetherington says.

He insists that there just aren't enough native-born workers available to meet demand and points to Sarasota County's 2.3 percent unemployment rate.

His company built 300 homes last year. Without immigrant workers, "we'd have been lucky to build 75," he says.

Wetherington does not know how many of those workers are undocumented, but he suspects it's the majority. He recalls an incident last year when the arrival of workers' comp officials spooked laborers into thinking an immigration raid was underway.

"Everyone scattered," he says. "The entire site just cleared out."

Ft. Lauderdale Home Supply is 11.4 Months, Up From 1.9 a Year Ago

According to USA Today, the picture is worse for condos, which account for more than half of home sales. Condo sales declined 37% in April compared with a year ago. And the inventory of condos for sale has shot up 386%, to a 12.3-month supply.

May 29, 2006

More Reasons Why The Bubble Is Popping & Buying Myths Debunked

An Excellent write-up by a fellow blogger on Friday points out many reasons why the U.S. is experiencing a bursting of the housing bubble.  The entry also goes on to discuss 43 points that doubters of a housing bubble postulate and reasons why they are wrong, point by point.  Definitely a good read for skeptics of a housing bubble and housing speculators alike.  Here's an excerpt:

"There are great tax advantages to owning."
FALSE. It is now far cheaper to rent a house in the San Francisco Bay Area than it is to own that same house, even with the deductibility of mortgage interest figured in. It is possible to rent a good house for $1800/month. That same house would cost about $700,000. Assume 6% interest we can see that a buyer loses at least $4,936 per month by buying. Renting is a loss of course, but buying is a much bigger loss.

Renting:
Rent: $1,800
----------------------
Monthly Loss: $1,800

Buying:
Property Tax: $486 ($729 per month at 1.25% before
deduction, $486 lost after deduction.)
Interest: $2,333 ($3500 per month at 6% before
deduction, $2333 lost after deduction.)
Other Costs: $450 (Insurance, maintenance, long commute, etc.)
Principle loss: $1,667 (Modest 3% yearly loss on $700,000.
Reality will be much worse.)
----------------------
Monthly Loss: $4,936

This is a very conservative estimate of the loss from owning per month. If you include a realistic decline in house prices, as in this rent-vs-own calculator, you'll see that owning right now is a very poor choice.

Remember that buyers do not deduct interest from income tax; they deduct interest from taxable income. Interest is paid in real pre-tax dollars that buyers suffered to earn. That money is really entirely gone, even if the buyer didn't pay income tax on those dollars before spending them.

Buyers do not get interest back at tax time. If a buyer gets an income tax refund, that's just because he overpaid his taxes, giving the government an interest-free loan. The rest of us are grateful.

Under current conditions, a renter would be able to live in a Bay Area house for 30 years, then buy that $700,000 house outright with the saved principal payments and have avoided $810,846 in interest payments. Rent would be only $648,000 over those 30 years, so the renter comes out at least $162,846 ahead. See an "amortization table" if you don't believe that interest will cost more than the house. This doesn't even count the huge losses the owner will suffer as the value of his house falls year after year for the next decade or more, just as in Japan, nor property taxes, insurance, and maintenance.

Rents will rise eventually, even though they have been falling every year for about five years now. Rising rents should be more than offset by appreciation on the renter's saved principle payments, assuming the renter invests in index funds or any other investment that brings in more than a CD.

There is no need to wait 30 years to buy a house. As this crash accelerates, prices will fall to the point where it is cheaper to buy than to rent, though that could take five years or more.

If you don't own a house but want to live in one, your choice now is to rent a house or rent money to buy a house. To rent money is to take out a loan. A mortgage is a money-rental agreement. House renters take no risk at all, but money-renting owners take on the huge risk of falling house prices, as well as all the costs of repairs, insurance, property taxes, etc. It is much cheaper to rent the house than to rent the money.

There are large tax disadvanges to buying in California. Because of Proposition 13, more properly called "screw the newcomer", it is common for new buyers to pay ten times the property tax that their neighbors pay. Tax rates are set at the time of purchase, which means those who bought long ago pay essentially nothing, and the new buyers pay all property tax for everyone else. Upgrading houses makes you a newcomer all over again.

Then there's earthquake insurance. It's really expensive, so most people just skip it and risk everything on the chance that no earthquake will happen.

Full Text 

May 28, 2006

In South Florida it's a Renter's Market. Mortgage Holders Having Many Sleepless Nights

In Palm Beach County, many buyers during the peak have been stuck holding the bag, maintaining sky-high payments on property that's sitting unsold.  In the meantime, renters are making out beautifully.  To give you guys some examples:

  • In Riviera Beach three-bedroom townhomes are renting for as low as $1,150 a month. Owning one would cost about $1,800 to $3,000 a month, after a 20 percent down payment.
  • In West Palm Beach, $400,000 townhomes are renting in the $1,500 range. Owning one would cost nearly twice that per month.
  • In Lantana, a $450,000 three-bedroom condo with an Intracoastal view is available for $1,850 per month.
  • In Port St. Lucie, three-bedroom, $450,000 houses are renting for about $2,200, a third less than they would cost to own.
  • In Wellington, $800,000 homes that would cost nearly $6,000 per month to buy are renting for about $3,000.

 
Terrence McManus, president of Florida RentFinders, said now that the interest-only periods have ended on many investors' mortgages, "they're trying to get income out of their houses any way they can."

McManus said that most of the landlords he works with are renting at a loss.

"None of them is cash-flow positive," he said.

Some agents are advising landlords to slash rents in order to create even a trickle of cash.

"If it takes seven months to rent at $4,000, you're better off getting $2,000 right away."

For the particular article that discusses this trend, many people wouldn't even comment on the renting situation for fear of further eroding the market.  From the looks of it, why wouldn't someone rent at this point and just wait it out? Considering that some have gotten a $2M house for $4K a month, why would you want to risk owning in South Florida at this point?

 

May 27, 2006

Home Sales Fall, Prices Level off in South Florida.

South Florida's housing market remained soft in April, giving buyers more choices and sellers more grief.

Sales of existing single-family homes and condominiums plummeted in Broward County last month, while prices leveled off from record highs in the fall, the Florida Association of Realtors said Thursday.

After five years of bidding wars and huge price appreciations, the market has turned. With more than triple the number of homes for sale compared with last year at this time, buyers have become selective and unwilling to make full-price offers.

 

 

"Buyers are a commodity right now," said Joanie Villanti, a real estate agent in Broward and Palm Beach counties. "When they walk in, it's like, `Let me kiss your ring.'"

Almost 700 single-family homes changed hands in Broward last month, a 37 percent drop from April 2005, the Realtors group said.

The median price of an existing single-family home inched up 5 percent to $360,600, compared with last April. That's nowhere near the 25 and 30 percent price increases common during the recent five-year housing boom.

Broward condo sales also dropped 37 percent, while the median price rose 17 percent over last April to $214,200. The median means half sold for more, half for less.

Although median prices continue to increase year over year, the numbers from the Realtors group are misleading, said David Levin, a Delray Beach real estate consultant.

Rapid price appreciations during the past five years have put homes out of reach for many middle-income consumers, as evidenced by fewer sales. That leaves the wealthy to buy expensive properties, which skews the median price upward, Levin said.

The median price of a single-family home has dropped 3 percent since January and is likely to fall even more as homes for sale and interest rates both rise, Levin said.

A 30-year fixed rate mortgage in April averaged 6.51 percent, up from 5.86 percent last April, the Realtors association said.

"Regionally, we have issues to deal with," Levin said.

The market was destined to slip because local wages couldn't keep up with the enormous price hikes, experts say. Broward's median price has more than doubled in the past five years. In April 2001, a typical Broward home cost $167,200.

In Palm Beach County, single-family home sales fell 43 percent in April. The median price of $386,500 rose 4 percent. Miami-Dade sales declined 31 percent, while the median increased 12 percent to $374,500.

Statewide, most markets were off as sales slipped 31 percent, while the median price rose 13 percent to $249,700. Nationally, sales of homes, townhomes, condos and co-ops fell nearly 6 percent in April compared to April 2005, the National Association of Realtors said Thursday.

More than 20,300 homes and condos were for sale in Broward last month, an increase of 321 percent over April 2005, according to the Realtor Association of Greater Fort Lauderdale. Despite the slowdown, some South Florida real estate agents remain optimistic.

"We had record, steroid-type numbers last year," said Mike Pappas, president of Miami-based Keyes Co. Realtors. "Even at 75 percent, these are very strong numbers."

Sellers, though, are struggling to stay positive.

Bruce Sherter finally found a buyer this week for his $599,999, five-bedroom Parkland home.

It took six months and five price reductions.

The 43-year-old financial analyst and his listing agent, Debbie Anderson of Prudential Florida WCI Realty, say sellers have to be serious from the start.

"If you want the home to sell, you have to be aggressive with the price," Sherter said.

May 24, 2006

Massachusetts Housing Market in a Major Glut - Prices May Soon Fall

An interesting article from the Boston Globe today paints a picture of how some buyers are desperate to sell in the Boston area.  The situation is especially precarious for sellers in a subdivision, where multiple, almost identical homes are now competing with each other for buyers... definitely a buyer's market. 

Across Massachusetts, the average number of single-family homes for sale each month during the first quarter of 2006 rose by 16,467, to a record 55,338 homes, the Massachusetts Association of Realtors said.

Homes are piling up on the market because sales have slowed dramatically in the past year. Sales of single-family homes fell to their lowest April level since 1995, according to a monthly housing report issued yesterday by the Warren Group, a Boston firm that collects real estate data.

Single-family home sales fell 16.5 percent last month, to 4,142 statewide, compared to the same month last year.

The condominium market, which until recently had better withstood the housing slowdown, experienced a 15.3 percent decline in sales last month, to 2,420 units.

May 23, 2006

A summary of housing-bust red flags

Tonight we'd like to recap all of the reasons why the housing bubble appears to be bursting...


  • Toll Brothers has said their orders are down 33%
  • 10 Las Vegas Projects put on hold
  • The University of Michigan’s Consumer Confidence Index for April was 79, compared to 87.4 in March, the lowest since Hurricane Katrina.
  • Housing starts in April were down 7.4% at an annual rate of 1.85 million, the third consecutive monthly decline and the slowest since November 2004.
  • According to the Washington Post a greater proportion of mortgage financers tapped their home equity for cash in the first quarter 2006 than any other quarter in 15 years.  More than 50% of these applicants borrowed at higher rates.
  • Ameriquest, is closing 229 branches and laying off 3,500 employees.
  • According to the Wall Street Journal, late payments on mortgages are rising.  Delinquencies are sharply higher on loans made last year.
  • 29% of 2005 purchasers now have no equity in the homes.
  • America’s new jobs figure for March was 138,000 - economists had estimated 200,000. 138,000 is the lowest since October last year and it followed three months of downward revisions.

 

 Please write me and let me know if we should add any to this list.

May 22, 2006

Relatively Small Drop in Real Estate Values = Financial Ruin

Ran across an interesting blog entry showing readers just how easily home buyers can be wiped out.  The artice mainly shows how a family investing 80K of their own money into a 360K home (20% down)  can lose everything due to a 10% decline in value.  A sobering read for sure...

 

Full Text  

May 21, 2006

Florida Home Flippers Feeling the Pain

Many investors in Port St Lucie, Florida are struggling at the moment, with buyers walking away from contracts, throwing in large incentives and resorting to highly unusual tactics to sell their homes.  Some buyers are even contemplating suing the builders that sold them their home, accusing them of misrepresentation.

"Their thought was, 'I'll make $25,000 on each home, or $100,000 on each home, and I'll get rich,' " said Bradley Hunter, South Florida division director of Metrostudy, a West Palm Beach-based housing research firm. "And for a while there, people were able to achieve that. But those days are gone."

 

Home Flippers' Investments Flop 

May 18, 2006

Bernanke: Soft, Orderly Landing for the Housing Market... REB Has its Doubts

Bob Bernanke, in a recent speech, states that the housing market is indeed cooling.  Now we know that many of you (especially eager buyers and vultures) are looking forward to a rapid deflation, but according to the Fed Chairman, it looks like it's going to be a soft landing for housing, the main economic catalyst of the last five years. 

At the moment, REB.com is observing very few parts of the country where sellers are desperately trying to unload, but as inventory rises even further, this too may change.  This is especially true in parts of Miami/Ft.Lauderdale, where "flippers" took out contracts on unfinished condos and are all trying to sell units simultaneously.  I have my fair share of doubts about the "soft landing."  Stay tuned...

For additional insight into Bernanke's testimony, an article from the Washington Post  

May 16, 2006

Torrid Building Pace Slowing...

As reported on Bloomberg News several hours ago, U.S. homebuilders broke ground on the fewest homes in 17 months.  Building permits fell 5.4%.  This news may give the Fed ample reason to pause its current rate hike policy, averting a potential 17th straight interest rate hike in June. 

May 15, 2006

San Diego Homeowners Defaulting En-masse?

As the debate rages on about the relationship between creative mortgage financing and foreclosure risk, an article in the  San Diego Sun today discusses the sudden upswing in defaults across the city and surrounding areas.    The number of defaults have risen 60% in the first three months of the year.  Neighboring Riverside County, where many San Diegans go in search of more affordable housing, had a 64 percent jump in default notices over the last year.  The article presents several interesting vignettes, discussing real life examples of "payment shock," rapid increases in mortgage payments predicted to hit the many borrowers who took out adjustable rate mortgages during the boom.  From a national perspective, foreclosures have followed a similar pattern:

“I think we have seen the best of times,” said Zoltan Pozsar, an economist for Moody's economy.com. “From here forward, we will see a deterioration in mortgage credit quality. Delinquencies will start going up. Those will lead to foreclosures for some people, primarily those who hold exotic mortgage loans.

Defaults “will not go through the roof but they will deteriorate because of regions like California, where  exotic loans are dominant.”

Personally, I am anxiously awaiting the Q2 foreclosure numbers. With much of the recent rise in rates hitting borrowers' bottom lines now, these numbers should lend more credence one way or the other about the ARM-Foreclosure link.  Foreclosures due to ARM-induced payment hikes are often cited as a potential catalyst for a housing bust.. stay tuned...

HOT: New Mexico, Louisiana, Montana and Mississippi

According to this article on MarketWatch this morning, existing home sales are up over 15% in the aforementioned states and down 22.2% year-over-year in Arizona, 19.2% in California, 18.2% in the District of Columbia, 15.7% in Florida and 15% in Nevada.  Also noteworthy:

Home price appreciation cooled in all four regions. In the West, prices are up 12% in the past year compared with an 18.9% gain the previous quarter. Prices are up 6.7% in the Midwest, 6.6% in the South and 6.6% in the Northeast.

For sellers out there, slowing appreciation is considerably better than a YoY declines (evidence of which we are always on the lookout for)

May 14, 2006

Think the Market's Gonna Drop? Now You Can Bet On it

Beginning on May 22nd, you home gamers can actually bet on the direction of the real estate market.  Let us explain... the Chicago Mercantile Exchange will begin trading futures and options cChicago Board of Tradeontracts in each of 10 major metropolitan areas (none of which are in the Northwest) along with one composite index.  The cities covered will be: Boston, Chicago, Denver, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, San Diego, San Francisco and Washington, D.C.   Prices will be based on the National Association of Realtors' median price for existing home sales in a particular area.  Although many of you will come to think of these as hedges against a drop in your own properties or investments, understand that these types of contracts are highly leveraged instruments.  Chicago Board contracts trade on margin, or 10 percent to 15 percent of the contract’s full price. Investors will be liable for the full amount in the event of margin calls or if they bet on the wrong price directions.  Given the high cost of these contracts, their initial audience will most likely be institutional investors, aka "smart money." Large institutions have made enormous bets on real estate over the last five years.  Could this be a way to help ensure a soft landing for many of them?

Teetering on a Bust in Phoenix

"For Sale" signs dotting the landscape, home browsers holding back offers, sellers dropping prices.. sound familiar?  Well it's currently taking place in Phoenix, a market that hit its peak late last year.  Although the situation isn't dire yet, many signals point to the start of a drop.  Housing "experts" in the region remain vigilant, though, proclaiming that Phoenix is still a "very strong" market this year.  You decide...

The Arizona Republic
May. 13, 2006 12:00 AM 
Home sales are plunging in metropolitan Phoenix, even as record numbers of people decide to put their houses on the market.

For now, the median sales price is holding firm. But with the number of for-sale signs dotting yards across the Valley, no one expects that to last.

"Buyers think, 'Why should I buy today? It will be less expensive in a month or three weeks.' Every listing agent I talk to is getting ridiculous lowball offers," said Diane Watson, a Realty Executives agent in north Scottsdale.
 

 
Through the first four months of 2006, the number of existing houses sold in the Valley is down 46 percent from last year and 12 percent from the same time in '04, before the region's real estate market took off.

Last month, there were 38,206 homes for sale, a record high. Agents say they are seeing more prices being cut, and there is the persistent question of whether the crucial summer selling season will be strong enough to rescue the year.

Neil Brooks, a Century 21 Arizona Foothills agent in the north Valley, said the clock is ticking on resales in metropolitan Phoenix. He expects a 10 to 15 percent price reduction Valley-wide if summer selling doesn't chop inventory.

"The next 60 days are crucial for Arizona real estate," he said.

That also is the opinion of Jay Butler, who heads the Arizona Real Estate Center at Arizona State University Polytechnic. Figures released this week by his office show that last month was the weakest April since 2000 but that the month's median home price of $264,900 was just $100 below the record.

Butler said the slack demand and firm prices reflect the fact that move-up buyers dominate in a more-expensive market.

Market still healthy

Valley real estate watchers will be keeping their eyes on the quarterly survey of markets across the country by the National Association of Realtors. It is due out Monday.

A spokesman said an early look shows that even though home appreciation has cooled recently in the Valley, the area is still high on the list for metropolitan areas with the biggest gains because it compares housing prices during the first quarter of 2006 with the first quarter of 2005.

Home prices shot up almost 50 percent Valley-wide last year but have been relatively flat since October.

Although Butler said the Valley's home-appreciation heyday was over sooner than many people expected, national experts aren't ready to write off the Phoenix market. Tim Sullivan of San Diego-based Sullivan Group Real Estate Advisors said there is a four-month supply of homes on the market in metropolitan Phoenix. Anything below a six-month supply of homes for sale signals a healthy market.

"Phoenix's housing market hit the sky last year," he said. "It hurts a little now because the market was so good last year, but it's not like prices have fallen and no one is buying. People are still buying in Phoenix, they are just taking their time."

In April, houses took nearly two months to sell, on average. Last year, they sold in just under a month, on average.

Erin Middleton and her husband have been trying to sell their house in Cave Creek for about a month. They tried selling it themselves, then hired an agent who has been marketing it hard and holding open houses.

Several people have walked through, but no one has gotten serious, even though they spent $8,000 on new paint, carpeting, kitchen appliances and countertops. They dropped the price Monday to $429,000 from $435,000 and are second-guessing their decision not to list the house last year when demand was strong.

"You can't sell regardless of the price," she said. "Nobody's looking. The market's not where it used to be."

Jim Sexton, owner of John Hall & Associates in Phoenix, said job growth and rising population (housing fundamentals) are still in place. He doesn't expect a price collapse.

"The market is far from falling apart," he said. "You're going to talk about real estate falling in a lot of other markets before you start talking about it here."

Soft landing predicted

Some cities around the Valley did see their median home values dip slightly last month. Tempe and Surprise, for example, posted small corrections. Other cities were flat, and Mesa was up slightly.

Margaret Dixon, broker and owner of Prudential Arizona Properties, thinks prices could drop 10 to 15 percent in areas hit hardest by speculators.

Typically, she said, outlying neighborhoods would "adjust first and adjust the most." She said areas closer to jobs and transportation are less susceptible to corrections.

"The core of the market is very strong," Dixon added. "It will be a soft landing."

Through April, there were more than 23,900 existing homes sold in the Valley. That's down 33.5 percent from last year and also below the 2004 figure of 26,710.

Higher interest rates have the potential to slow housing more.

Rates retreated from their march toward 7 percent during the past week but are still expected to hit that psychological plateau for buyers.

The average rate on a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage dipped slightly to 6.58 percent this week from 6.59 percent last week. David Lereah, the National Association of Realtor's chief economist, predicted that long-term mortgage rates would hit 7 percent by summer.

May 13, 2006

Housing boom a bust? In Florida it May Be

Things are getting really frigid in parts of Florida.  Many buyers are walking away from $30K-$80K deposits and condo converion sales have literally fallen off the table.  Jorge Perez, CEO of related companies, and one of the main architects of the South Florida housing boom,  blames the retreat on excessive media coverage of the bubble and a U.S. Federal Reserve that does not know when to let up with interest rate hikes.  He states in the article:

"To be part of that great growth, people have done projects in secondary sites, and the media [have] on a daily basis told prospective buyers the bubble is going to burst," he says. "I think people are taking a much more measured look at real estate. So our universe has shrunk. Speculators have almost dropped out of the market and sales have slowed down. And I think those people who should never have been in the development business -- because everybody became a developer in the last few years -- will suffer."

He thinks that his pockets are deep enough to weather the drop in real estate.. thanks to the horedes of buyers that stepped over each other to help sell out the majority of Related developments.  We'd be curious to hear what the selling climate is now in any of these developments.  Any of you out there care to comment?

Great article though, with some interesting vignettes... Full text after the jump...

 

(Welcome to Miami).

 

Housing boom a bust?

South Florida was once so hot speculators flocked to buy and flip properties. Now the market has cooled so much they're walking away from US$80,000 deposits

Financial Post
Published: Saturday, May 13, 2006

The U.S. housing market has endured a boom of historic proportions over the past few years. Adjusted for inflation, real price increases have been the highest on record, letting consumers extract equity in their homes to fund spending like never before. But many of the hottest markets in California and Florida have cooled. Jacqueline Thorpe travelled to Florida's east coast and found the mood souring faster than in Silicon Valley in the spring of 2000.

- - -

Florida's condo king, the Trump of the south, the largest developer of multi-family dwellings in the United States, is under no illusions about the property market that appears to be softening right beneath his stylishly shod feet.

Jorge Perez, 57, whose Related Group of Florida has ridden the recent U.S. property boom perhaps faster and further than any other developer -- including Donald Trump himself -- knows the market has cooled.

"Things are definitely slowing," says Mr. Perez in an interview in his office south of Miami, where an army of his luxury condominiums sits on almost every street corner and bulldozers frantically dig the ground for more.

Mr. Perez has about 14,000 units in 19 buildings worth US$8-billion either under construction or about to be started, most in South Florida.

"There has been a great amount of construction, some overbuilding," concedes Mr. Perez, pink shirt still crisp, despite a dash from the blast furnace outside.

"To be part of that great growth, people have done projects in secondary sites, and the media [have] on a daily basis told prospective buyers the bubble is going to burst," he says. "I think people are taking a much more measured look at real estate. So our universe has shrunk. Speculators have almost dropped out of the market and sales have slowed down. And I think those people who should never have been in the development business -- because everybody became a developer in the last few years -- will suffer."

Only time will tell whether prices will correct with a slow leak, a bang or even re-accelerate after a brief pause.

But as Canada gears up for another brisk homebuying season, U.S. figures show a sudden weakening since the end of last year.

Nationwide, new-home sales are 11% below last year's peak and existing home sales are off 5%. The inventory of single-family homes for sale has risen to a 5.3-month supply from 4.0 a year ago and the condo supply has nearly doubled to 6.9 months. Prices are still rising in most regions of the United States but no longer at a scorching pace; median resale prices are off 5% from their peak.

On the ground in Florida, which, like California and Washington, D.C., has posted double-digit sales declines in the past months, the mood is souring as fast as Silicon Valley in March, 2000.

Where developers in the Sunshine State once held lavish sales launch parties, with champagne, canapes and dancing acrobats in a market every bit as raucous as the high-tech frenzy, they're now throwing incentives at buyers. Where buyers camped out for days to get first dibs on some homes, they are now selling at auction. And where investors once turned to housing after their equity portfolios melted, they're now walking away from deposits.

"I think, in 18 months, as sad as it would be, there will be 30% fewer mortgage brokers in this business," says Richard Shaffer of Prestige Mortgage and Investment Group in Palm Beach, Fla.

An estimated 25% to 50% of all U.S. jobs have been connected to the housing industry in recent years, but jobs are not the only thing at stake.

Consumers have used the rising value of their homes to tap equity and fund spending in a way unknown a decade ago. A slump in prices could turn that tap off, causing a sharp slowdown in the economy, which could sideswipe Canada.

"This is the first cycle that you could actually instantaneously crystallize the rise in the notional price of a home and use it for current consumption," says David Rosenberg, chief North American economist for Merrill Lynch & Co.

"The mortgage market today is bigger than the government bond market; housing is valued at double the level of household equities on the household balance sheet," he says. "Never before has housing come to permeate the economic and social fabric to the extent that it does today. So that's why, if you ask me, what the No. 1 risk is to the U.S. economy: It is going to be what the house-price landscape is, what happens to house prices."

With most of his condo developments 100% sold, Mr. Perez believes he has deep enough pockets to weather any downturn. But take a trip a few miles north, to 444 Brickell Ave., where the whole building appears devoted to real estate -- searching titles, copying documents, lining up mortgages -- and the mood turns less hopeful. Go farther up the Florida Turnpike to less glamorous but equally real estate-obsessed markets such as Stuart or Port St. Lucie and the mood turns downright desperate.

Harry Rodstein, president of H.R. Mortgage & Realty Co. at 444 Brickell, says the market has turned on a dime.

He has sold seven of 12 US$600,000 to US$1.4-million units in a nearby condo project, but sales at his condo conversion in Sarasota have ground to a halt. Conversions are apartment buildings converted to condos, the latest real estate fad to hit the state.

"What I've seen is that sales, particularly in condo conversions, have fallen off the end of the table," he says.

He blames the retreat on excessive media coverage of the bubble and a U.S. Federal Reserve that does not know when to let up with interest rate hikes.

A 30-year fixed mortgage has risen to 6.49%, 100 basis points above its generational low in 2003, but nowhere near the 10%-plus rates that sent housing over the edge in the last major U.S. real estate slump in the late-1980s.

"People are mentally spooked and the argument is: 'Why does the Fed have to continue to beat it to destroy it?' " he says. "I don't get it."

Mr. Rodstein neglected to mention one crucial factor -- oversupply. Across the United States, there are 3.5 million single-family homes and condo units up for sale, a record, and up 30% from a year ago.

In Miami-Dade County alone, there are 25,000 condos under construction and another 25,000 that have already got their financing and are likely to go forward, says Jack McCabe, chief executive of McCabe Research and Consulting in Deerfield, Fla. In addition, 50,000 more have been announced.

In the whole period from 1995 to 2004, only 9,079 units were built in Miami Dade.

On the Turnpike going north from Miami, those numbers are reflected in the blizzard of billboards flying by, enticing homebuyers on every budget: "From the under US$900,000s. Great value, from the under US$100,000s." Golf community, gated community, the best in condo living, your private getaway by the beach.

And 160 kilometres up the coast, Stuart and Port St. Lucie bake in the humid air; a collection of delicate islands glitter off shore.

Once a sleepy hamlet, strong job growth and immigration made Port St. Lucie the fastest-growing city in the United States in July, 2004 -- its population having swollen 12% to 118,000.

Home prices swelled, too. They have risen 142% over the past five years, the third-highest among 30 cities in a recent study by Merrill Lynch. Florida has 16 cities with the greatest price appreciation, the most of any state.

Trouble is, the housing stock has been growing even faster. Building has been frenzied. Row upon row of "master-planned" developments fan out in every direction from the centre of Port St. Lucie.

In nearby Stuart, the joke among the locals at the Tikki Bar at the Ramada Inn -- complete with thatched roof and a cast of characters straight out of the movie Barfly -- is that the new Wal-Mart can't keep its shelves stocked because the only people the retailer can find to work keep failing the drug tests.

Mike Morgan, broker-owner of Morgan Florida Real Estate in Stuart, says the region had also been a magnet for the flippers who have played a key role in driving prices higher across the United States.

Buyers would put a deposit down on a house in pre-construction and quickly sell as the price rose, "flipping" the contract to the next person even before getting a mortgage.

"It was like a gold rush," says Mr. Morgan on a tour of "Martin's Crossing," a slapped-together-looking development of US$260,000 to US$300,000 homes and townhomes, wedged between a trailer park, drainage ditch and the highway.

"I was doing an open house for the townhomes we had listed there and these four elderly ladies told me they bought four of them. They said: 'We drove up from Miami and Ft. Lauderdale, we got off the I-95 and this was the first thing we found.' They bought four."

According to the National Association of Realtors, sales of second homes for investment or vacation purposes hit records last year, accounting for four of 10 real estate transactions.

Mr. Morgan has had investors from the U.K., an actress from Los Angeles and buyers from all over the United States wanting to buy, sight unseen.

"Here's the pool," he says wryly, pointing to a swamp at the back of the development, a 21st century twist on that old line, "If you believe that...."

The garages are so tiny Mr. Morgan can't fit his truck in and there's no room to park on the street because the driveways are jammed together. A knot of gas pipes is an interesting front-yard ornament.

There are "For Sale" signs on every block and many homes are obviously empty, without curtains on the windows.

Obsessively checking his BlackBerry for potential leads, Mr. Morgan says people wouldn't ask him the questions they normally ask when looking for real estate, such as details about the location, amenities and taxes.

"They would only be concerned whether it was pre-construction," says Mr. Morgan. "Pre-construction became the buzzword, like dot-com. They only wanted pre-construction. I'd say I've got these units that were already built and they'd give a good income stream, but they'd say, 'No, no, I want to flip the contract before I close.'"

When builders clamped down on flipping about a year ago, forcing buyers to produce a mortgage contract before agreeing to a deal, many turned to such exotic financial products as adjustable rate mortgages and interest-only loans that allow minimal payments at the beginning of the term.

If a buyer flips before the mortgage is reset and the price of the home is higher, the investment can work beautifully, but the risk is the house doesn't sell and the buyer is stuck with a jump in rates.

The Merrill Lynch study found non-traditional mortgage products accounted for 60% of loans last year in California, the hottest market in the United States.

"That's really bizarre," says Mr. Shaffer at Prestige Mortgage. "When you think about it, you should be fixing at historically low rates."

Many flippers are now walking away from their deposits or trying to wiggle out of their contracts, using shoddy workmanship as a loophole. Mr. Morgan says he now has 43 investors who are walking away from deposits of US$35,000 to US$80,000.

Bruce, a telecom manager in Los Angeles, walked away from two deals in Port St. Lucie earlier this year. He had flipped half-a-dozen properties from L.A. to Arizona, making from US$75,000 to close to US$200,000 on each.

"At the beginning of last year, I came to Port St. Lucie," he says, wishing to keep his last name unknown. "I looked at the situation but I didn't really get the same feeling."

Against his gut instinct, he went ahead anyway and bought three townhomes in a low-end development. In an indication of how lax the market was, the developers were asking for deposits of only US$1,000 each. He kept one and pulled out of two, and Mr. Morgan reimbursed him the deposit.

In Port St. Lucie, staff in the model homes along Bayshore Boulevard are plying their trade like snake oil salesmen on Saturday night at a county fair.

The homes, certainly gorgeous with granite in the kitchen, marble in the bathroom, sunken tubs, walk-in closets and lap pools out back, are practically deserted on a Wednesday afternoon. The sales reps pounce on the few stragglers and the incentives start flying.

Mercedes Homes is offering to pay up to US$10,000 worth of closing costs and a buyer can get a 5.5% mortgage versus the going rate of 6%. Star Homes of Florida is throwing in granite counters, maple cabinets and stainless steel GE appliances. At the Portofino at Jensen Beach, the developers are offering 2% of the purchase price toward closing costs, and offer to cover one year of home-ownership dues.

It's a far cry from a year ago when the money was flowing and developers tried to outdo each other with their elaborate launch parties.

"It's been nuts down here," says Mr. McCabe at McCabe Research. "It's just been a circus. We've seen grand openings where projects, hundreds and hundreds of units, were sold out in one day or in a weekend. We've had celebrities brought in for these grand openings. We've had lotteries."

In Miami, Cabi Developers erected a fog-strewn jungle complete with fauna -- a Florida panther, baby alligator and squawking parrots -- to draw buyers to the Everglades on the Bay in late 2004, according to a story in The Miami Herald.

Recently, three new homes at PGA Village, an exclusive golf community in St. Lucie West, were sold by auction.

Jeff Banack, 38, an investment salesman, picked up a two-bedroom home for US$235,000 plus the 10% buyer's premium after some intense bidding on a balmy evening. He got a deal.

Al Deleeuw, a builder from Detroit, had two similar houses for sale on the same street for US$350,000 and US$345,000.

Mr. Deleeuw says he thought the price was right because he's had price agreements on both, but they fell through.

"I think the criteria is getting a little bit difficult for people to get mortgages," says Mr. Deleeuw, on the phone from Detroit. "South Florida is not as affordable as it used to be. It is taking a lot longer to sell. The days of flipping these things in two or three weeks are over."

At the auction, one of the associates at Karlin Daniel & Associates Inc., the auctioneer adds: "We are the price reality check."

The locals at the Tikki Bar in Stuart shake their heads in amusement at the craziness that descended on their city.

"Port St. Lucie used to be the country -- now you can't get through the traffic," says Lesa Woodall Pence, a Mary Kay beauty consultant whose luminous skin is a rarity in this sun-drenched place. "I'm looking to move."

Her mobile home was trashed by Hurricane Wilma last year. She's thinking about Tennessee.

Non-Florida residents, such as Canadian snowbirds, are also facing mounting municipal taxes while hurricane insurance is hard to get and expensive.

Mr. Morgan is convinced the retreat is going to be ugly and Mr. McCabe is trying to set up a vulture fund of sorts to buy up depressed property.

He's hoping to raise US$250-million in equity and borrow US$750-million to buy up to US$1-billion in new condos, possibly some projects or development sites. Interest has been strong, he says.

But there is also a decent chance markets could just cool down for a bit and the balance restored as supply is absorbed, especially if the Fed is nearly done with the rate hikes, as many expect.

Florida has only had four quarters of declining prices in recent times -- two in 1976 and two in 1994-95, the least of any state, according to the Merrill Lynch study.

But it has also had the mother of all U.S. housing crashes, the land bust of the mid-1920s as buyers dried up after an eerily similar property explosion.

For his part, Mr. Perez forecasts a secondary boom once the excess disappears.

"We're confident that we have produced so much product that we have delivered, or [are] ready to deliver, [and] our financial position is so strong we will be able to weather any downturn in the market," he says.

Related Group, privately held with Mr. Perez as main shareholder, had reported sales of US$3.2-billion in 2005.

He is now looking at land in Atlanta as well as other parts of the country, and has certainly not given up on Florida.

He recently announced a partnership with Donald Trump, a friend and collaborator in the past, to build a 40-storey luxury condo in Hollywood, Fla. Prices range from US$1.6-million to US$6-million.

10 Cities Where the Bubble will Burst

A recent article discusses the bubble bursting prospects for 10 cities, namely:

Las Vegas, Sarcaremento, Phoenix, Boston, L.A., Miami, Naples, Edison/Newark, NJ, and Suffolk/Nassau Counties.

 

Full details after the jump...  

Las Vegas: What goes up must come down. Fortune lists Las Vegas dead last in its list of 100 metro markets for housing appreciation in the next two years, predicting a two-year combined decrease in housing values of nearly 13%. Local Market Monitor reported a 33% increase in appreciation between 2003 and 2004, and then a 14% increase by the third quarter of 2005, evidence that prices have begun to cool.

"Las Vegas is a very interesting market," Winzer says. "A lot of people moved in, but construction has kept up with the pace. For a long time until recently, I didn't consider it an overpriced market. I don't think the price increases will last. There's really not an inability to produce new homes out there if there is a demand for it."

Sacramento, Calif.: We're not quite sure what Sacramento ever did to anyone, but it showed up on just about everyone's list of has-been markets. Winzer's Local Home Value Ratings rates the market as 59% overvalued and Burns Housing Cycle Barometer also lists it as overpriced.

"Sacramento, we think, has topped out," says Gollis of The Concord Group. "There is just so much (housing construction) in the pipeline. It's a steady-as-she goes market and has always had consistent growth, but we think the land market has gotten ahead of itself."

Phoenix: The bigger they are, the harder they fall, and Phoenix is the largest housing market in the country in terms of new construction. It's been running at 65,000 new units per year, with housing appreciation increasing at rates of nearly 30% per year.

"You can't sustain 30% increases a year for very long," Winzer says. "Of all the 100 markets we review, we think if you're an investor in Phoenix, you should sell, because vacancy rates are already pretty high." Gollis says his firm has been studying the market carefully and doesn't like what it sees. "It's had an incredibly unusual amount of growth," he says. "The land market has accelerated dramatically and the lot price as percentage of the home price has gone up significantly. We have some concerns about going long in Phoenix."

Boston: This one is in Winzer's backyard, his firm is based in Wellesley, Mass., so he sees what is happening there every day.

"Until about a year ago, homes would go on sale and be gone in a week," he says. "Now they're sitting on the market for a year." He doesn't see the prices dropping rapidly here -- or in any market, for that matter -- because while real estate prices escalate rapidly, they drop slowly.

"In markets that are well-overpriced, prices don't really fall because people just won't sell," he says. "The adjustment mechanism is skewed by people's emotions getting involved. People will grit their teeth and hang on as long as they can to get the price they want."

They might not be able to hang on for long. Burns ranks Boston fourth on his list of markets likely looking at a bubble; Winzer's analysis indicates the market is 33% overvalued.

Los Angeles: The City of Angels has been described as the poster child for how a lack of new housing near employment centers can hurt an economy. Affordable housing has been an issue in the market for years. It's ranked as one of the least affordable places in the country to live, with housing prices consuming 91% of income, according to statistics from John Burns Real Estate Consulting. The median price of an existing single-family home was $568,000 at the end of 2005, the National Association of Realtors reports. Plus, job growth is virtually flat. Together, it's cause for real estate market consultant Gollis to predict that the prices for California coastal markets are topping out in single-family homes. Fortune predicts a drop-off of nearly 8% in housing prices in the next two years, putting it in 95th out of 100 markets for growth.

Naples, Fla.: At 72%, Naples is No. 2 on Local Market Monitor's list of overvalued markets in the country (Santa Barbara-Santa Maria, Calif., is No. 1 at 86% overvalued). In actual pricing, it outpaces other Florida markets by a good $100,000 margin. Plus, there is an abundance of more affordably priced options for buyers within a short driving distance. It is no understatement that entire cities are being built nearby. "The markets that are the most overvalued are the ones at greatest risk of a substantial correction," Winzer says. "Naples is at the top of that."

Miami/Fort Lauderdale, Fla.: Rapid, dramatic price increases over the past two years -- and an extraordinary amount of new products being built in the condo market -- is the reason many real estate market analysts think this market just can't sustain much more in terms of price increases. The market probably won't decline, they say, because the region remains attractive to South American and European buyers, but there just isn't sufficient demand to absorb the entire available inventory. Plus, according to NAR research, affordability is an issue in the market, calling the home price-to-income ratio "unfavorable."

Edison and Newark, N.J.: As far as the real estate analysts are concerned, these two cities have pretty big targets on them for a decline in appreciation. John Burns Real Estate Consulting ranks Edison seventh -- ahead of Los Angeles, Miami and Washington, D.C. -- as a market facing a potential housing bubble. It gives Newark an F on its local market grading scale, attributable largely to the loss of several thousand jobs and the highest housing-cost-to-income percentage in the state's metro markets. Fortune predicts a very modest 1.2% gain in housing appreciation this year for Edison that would be wiped out in 2007 by a loss of 2.9%. The situation is similar in Newark, where Fortune suggests a 1.5% increase this year will be canceled out by a 1.8% loss the following year.

Nassau/Suffolk, N.Y.: Otherwise known as Long Island, this market is No. 2 in the country on real estate consultant John Burns' list of locations facing a potential housing bubble. (Modesto, Calif., has the top spot.) Similarly, Fortune predicts a loss of about 6% in housing values over the next two years.

May 12, 2006

California Foreclosure Activity Highest in Two Years

Numbers are starting to trickle in about first quarter foreclosure activity in California and as a bunch of people predicted, the numbers have drastically increased.

First-quarter foreclosure activity in California increased to the highest level in more than two years, the result of slower home price increases, a real estate information service reported.

Lending institutions sent 18,668 default notices to California homeowners during the January-to-March period. That was up 23.4 percent from 15,122 for the prior quarter, and up 28.7 percent from 14,501 for 2005's first quarter, according to DataQuick Information Systems. On a loan-by-loan basis, mortgages are least likely to go into default in the Bay Area. The likelihood is highest in the Central Valley and Inland Empire."

One point, though.  While foreclosure properties tugged property values down by almost ten percent in some areas nine years ago, the effect on today's market is negligible, DataQuick reported.

Detailed default numbers after the jump.....

Notices of Default
houses and condos

County/Region2005Q12006Q1%Chg
Los Angeles3,5354,21119.1%
Orange7751,10742.8%
San Diego9601,53359.7%
Riverside1,3072,14864.3%
San Bernardino1,4271,67017.0%
Ventura26143365.9%
SoCal Total8,33011,10233.3%
San Francisco10412722.1%
Alameda5165649.3%
Contra Costa5766055.0%
Santa Clara5005275.4%
San Mateo188186-1.1%
Marin647618.8%
Solano2692949.3%
Sonoma13915712.9%
Napa294762.1%
Bay Area Total2,3852,5838.3%
Santa Cruz6710861.2%
Santa Barbara9313343.0%
San Luis Obispo70757.1%
Monterey7912963.3%
Coast Total30944544.0%
Sacramento7631,13648.9%
San Joaquin45158629.9%
Placer12623989.7%
Kern40646113.5%
Fresno4945409.3%
Madera557943.6%
Merced13515313.3%
Tulare2112120.5%
Yolo424814.3%
El Dorado6254-12.9%
Stanislaus29145155.0%
San Benito274981.5%
Yuba2348108.7%
Sutter3128-9.7%
Central Valley Tot.3,1174,13032.5%
Mountains Total11096-12.7%
North Calif Total25031224.8%
Statewide14,50118,66828.7%

Long Island Bubble Slowly Deflating, Taking Turn for Buyers

The word from Long Island this morning is that price appreciation in some counties has slowed dramatically while others have actually declined year over year. 

"The latest data from the Long Island Multiple Listing Service showed annual median price increases of 4.3 percent in April for [Suffolk and Nassau counties], with Nassau at $470,000 and Suffolk at $385,000. Nassau's price remained stable since March, but Suffolk's declined by 3 percent. Residential inventory, meanwhile, rose by 65 percent over the year in Suffolk County and 76 percent in Nassau County - each reaching levels not recorded as far back as the MLS records go, to 1980."

Many are suggesting that this has been the slowest spring in the last six years for local real estate, with the slowdown expected to continue into the summer.  One local agent also noted that of 60 updated listings in her region yesterday, 34 had lowered their listed prices.

Full Article

May 11, 2006

What does $1M buy you these days? Not much

Having a million dollar home ten years ago meant something... today? As this Forbes slightshow will show you, it doesn't buy you much.

 "According to a Census Bureau survey published in 2005, the number of million-dollar, owner-occupied homes in this country has nearly doubled since 2000. In fact, this segment of the housing market has grown so large that the Census changed its top home-value category from "$500,000 or more" in 1990, to "$1 million or more" in 2000.  Topping that Census list was the state of California, with 4.1%--almost one out of every 25--of its homes priced at or above the $1 million mark."

 

The Party Hasn't Stopped Up North

In parts of Canada, there's hardly a hint of a housing slowdown.  In Alberta for instance,  new home prices in Calgary were up 29.6% from a year ago and jumped 5.9% in March alone. Edmonton new home prices were up 14.3% from a year ago.  According to the latest data from the Calgary Real Estate Board, the average sale price of an existing home is up 37.1% over last year.  According to analysts, Alberta's gains were responsible for half of the 7.6% increase in homes across all of Canada.  Without the Alberta numbers, Canadian new home prices would have been up 4.1% in March from a year earlier.  Analysts attribute much of this rise to the oil boom and what they call a shortage of serviceable lots. 

All is not all rosy though on the other side of the country, though....

 

Canada has become a tale of two markets, the east and the west. A new forecast from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. Wednesday called for new home construction to rise in 2006 in most of the western provinces but slide in the rest of the country.

"CMHC is now predicting 45,000 new homes will be constructed in Alberta this year, up from 40,847 in 2005. British Columbia is forecast to jump to 37,000 from 34,667. By comparison, Ontario new home construction is expected to fall to 75,000 this year from 78,795. In Quebec, CMHC expects only 45,000 new homes to be built compared with 50,910 last year."

"When you do the comparisons, Atlantic Canada and Central Canada seems to floundering while Western Canada is flourishing," said Brent Weimer, a senior economist with CMHC

No Pulse for DC Price Appreciation

From BubbleMeter this morning, an interesting chart about DC Real Estate appreciation.  Prince George's County looks to be the only area sustaining a solid price increase Y/Y.  Any of you from the DC area want to comment about observations on the front lines?

 

May 10, 2006

Merill Lynch Predicts the Aftermath of The Bubble Burst